Use of Ethyl and Propyl (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoates in Codling Moth Management: Improved Monitoring in Bartlett Pear with High Dose Lures

Authors

  • A. L. Knight Yakima Agricultural Research Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA 5230 Konnowac Pass Rd. Wapato, WA 98951
  • D. M. Light Western Regional Research Center Agricultural Research Service, USDA Albany, CA 94710

Keywords:

Cydia pomonella, monitoring, kairomone, trapping

Abstract

The propyl and ethyl esters of (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoic acid were evaluated in gray halobutyl septa as kairomone lures for both sexes of codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.). All studies were conducted in 'Bartlett' pear orchards with moderate to high codling moth adult population densities and treated with sex pheromone dispensers for mating disruption. Variable results were obtained with kairomone loading experiments. Increasing the lure loading to 40.0 mg of either the ethyl or propyl ester significantly increased male and total moth catch in separate experiments. However, in other tests with the ethyl ester no difference was found in total moth catch in traps baited with 0.1, 1.0, 3.0 or 10.0 mg versus 40.0 mg lures. The 40.0 mg ethyl and propyl ester lures were both more effective than a 3.0 mg ethyl ester lure and comparable to a sex pheromone lure in detecting the beginning of codling moth flight in the spring generation. No difference was found in moth catch between 40.0 mg propyl and ethyl ester lures. Significantly more females were caught in traps baited with 1.0 – 10.0 mg than with 1.0 – 100.0 μg lures loaded with the ethyl ester. In general, kairomone lures caught significantly fewer moths than sex pheromone lures.

References

Analytical Software. 2000. Statistix 7. Tallahassee, FL.

Charmillot, P.J. 1990. Mating disruption technique to control codling moth in WesternSwitzerland, pp. 165-182. In R.L. Ridgway, R.M. Silverstein and M.N. Inscoe (eds.), Behavior-modifying chemicals for insect pest management. Marcel Dekker, New York.

Creveling, R.K. and W.G. Jennings. 1970. Volatile components of Bartlett pear. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 18: 19-24.

Gut, L.J. and J.F. Brunner. 1996. Implementing codling moth mating disruption in Washington pome fruit orchards. Tree Fruit Research Extension Center Information Series, No. 1. Washington State University. Wenatchee, WA.

Heinz, D.E., M.R. Sevenants, and W.G. Jennings. 1966. Preparation of fruit essences for gas chromatography. Journal of Food Science 31: 63-68.

Jennings, W.G., R.K. Creveling, and D.E. Heinz. 1964. Volatile esters of Bartlett pear. IV. Esters of trans:2-cis:4-decadienoic acid. Journal of Food Science 29: 730-734.

Knight, A.L. 2002a. A comparison of gray halo-butyl elastomer and red rubber septa to monitor codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in sex pheromone-treated orchards. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 99: 123-132.

Knight, A.L. 2002b. Using the kairomone lure, DA2313 to monitor codling moth in apple and pear, p. 27. In Proceedings, Western Orchard Pest and Disease Management Conference, 9-11 January 2002. Portland , OR.

Knight, A.L. and D.M. Light. 2001. Attractants from 'Bartlett' pear for codling moth, Cydia pomonella(L.), larvae. Naturwissenschaften 88:339-342.

Knight, A.L., R.P.J. Potting and D.M. Light. 2002. Modeling the impact of a sex pheromone kairomone attracticide for management of codling moth (Cydia pomonella). Acta Hort 584: 215-220.

Knight, A.L., P. VanBuskirk, R. Hilton, B Zoller, and D.M. Light. 2005. Monitoring codling (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in four cultivars of pear. Acta Hort. (in press).

Light, D.M., A.L. Knight, C.A. Henrick, D. Rajapaska, B. Lingren, J.C. Dickens, K.M.Reynolds, R.G. Buttery, G. Merrill, J. Roitman and B.C. Campbell. 2001. A pear-derived kairomone with pheromonal potency that attracts male and female codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.). Naturwissenschaften 88:333-338.

Miller, R.L., D.D. Bills, and R.G. Buttery. 1989. Volatile components from Bartlett and Bradford pear leaves. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 37: 1476-1479.

Riedl, H., B.A. Croft, and A.J. Howitt. 1976. Forecasting codling moth phenology based on pheromone trap catches and physiological-time models. The Canadian Entomologist 108: 449-460.

Riedl, H., J.F. Howell, P.S. McNally, and P.H. Westigard. 1986. Codling moth management, use and standardization of pheromone trapping systems. University of California Bulletin 1918. Berkeley, CA.

Scutareanu, P., B. Drukker, J. Bruin, M.A. Posthumus, and M.W. Sabelis. 1997. Volatiles from Psyllainfested pear trees and their possible involvement in attraction of Anthocorid predators. Journal of Chemical Ecology 23: 2241-2260.

Shiota, H. 1990. Changes in the volatile composition of La France pear during maturation. Journal of Science and Food Agriculture 52: 421-429

Zoller, B.G. and A.M. Zoller. 2003. Comparison of kairomone DA 2313 and pheromone lure trapping for codling moth with oviposition monitoring, p. 22. In Proceedings, Western Orchard Pest and Disease Management Conference, 15-17 January 2003, Portland, OR.

Downloads