Brood production by three species of <i>Dendroctonus</i> (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in bolts from host & non-host trees

Authors

  • L. Safranyik Pacific Forest Research Centre Canadian Forestry Service Environment Canada Victoria, B.C.
  • D. A. Linton Pacific Forest Research Centre Canadian Forestry Service Environment Canada Victoria, B.C.

Abstract

Brood establishment and production by mountain pine beetles, Douglas-fir beetles and spruce beetles were investigated in the laboratory, in 40 cm bolts of subalpine fir, spruce (<i>Picea glauca</i> x <i>P. engelmannii</i> hybrid), lodgepole pine and Douglas-fir. In subalpine fir, a few eggs were laid by mountain pine and spruce and Douglas-fir beetles but no brood matured. Production of egg galleries by spruce beetles in this host was the same as it was in spruce, its principal host. In Douglas-fir, eggs were produced only by Douglas-fir beetles and the production of galleries by this bark beetle was significantly greater than that by either of the other beetles. All three beetle species produced mature broods in lodgepole pine and in spruce.

References

Amman, G.D. 1978. Biology, ecology and causes of outbreaks of the mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine forests. Pp. 39-53 In: Theory and practice of mountain pine beetle management in lodgepole pine forests. Symposium Proceedings. Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA, April 25-27, 1978.

Dyer, E.D.A. 1969. Influence of temperature inversion on development of spruce beetle, Dendroctonus obesus (Mannerheim) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J. Ent. Soc. B.C. 66:41-45.

Furniss, M.M., R.L. Livingston, and M.D. McGregor. 1981. Development of a stand susceptibility classification for Douglas-fir beetle. Pp. 115-128. In Hazard rating svstems in forest insect pest management: Symposium Proceedings, Athens, Georgia, July 31-August 1, 1980. USDA For. Serv. Gen, Tech. Rept. WO-27.

Johnson, N.E. 1960. Douglas-fir beetle: A problem analysis. Weyerhaeuser Co. For. Res. Note 29. 19 pp.

Lanier, G.N. and D.L. Wood. 1968. Controlled mating, karyology, morphology and sex-ratio in the D. ponderosae complex. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 61(2):517-526.

Massey, C.L. and N.D. Wygant. 1954. Biology and control of the Engelmann spruce beetle in Colorado, USDA For. Serv. Cir. No. 944. 35 p.

McCambridge, W.F. and F.B. Knight. 1972. Factors affecting spruce beetles during a small outbreak. Ecology 53:830-839.

Safranyik, L., D.M. Shrimpton, and H.S. Whitney. 1974. Management of lodgepole pine to reduce losses from the mountain pine beetle. Env. Canada. For. Serv. Forestry Technical Report 1. 24 pp.

Schmid, J.M. and R.H. Frye. 1977. Spruce beetle in the Rockies. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mtn. For. and Range Expt. Stn. Fort Collins. Gen. Tech. Rept. RM-49. 38 pp.

Wood, S.L. 1982. The bark and ambrosia beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a taxonomic monograph. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs No. 6. Brigham University, Provo, Utah. 1,359 pp.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-17