Green leaf volatiles disrupt and enhance response by the ambrosia beetle, Gnathotrichus retusus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to pheromone-baited traps
Abstract
Experiments were conducted to test the null hypothesis that green leaf volatiles, abundant in herbaceous plants and angiosperm trees, have no effect on the response by the conifer-infesting ambrosia beetle, Gnathotrichus retusus (LeConte), to pheromonebaited traps. A blend of four green leaf alcohols, 1-hexanol, (E)-2-hexen-1-ol, (Z)-2-hexen-1-ol, and (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol, each released at ca. 4 mg per 24 h, combined with a blend of two green leaf aldehydes, hexanal and (E)-2-hexenal, each released at ca. 13.0 mg per 24 h, reduced catches of females to levels not significantly different from those in unbaited control traps. Any of the four green leaf alcohols released alone disrupted responses of females, while 1-hexanol and (E)-2-hexen-1-ol strongly reduced catches of males. The two green leaf aldehydes released together, and (E)-2-hexenal released alone, weakly enhanced trap catches. These results lead to rejection of the null hypothesis on the basis of both positive and negative effects. Disruptive green leaf volatiles may have promise as forest product protectants against ambrosia beetles, by disguising hosts as non-hosts.Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia agree to the following terms:
-Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
-Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
-Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).