Evaluation of two repellent semiochemicals for disruption of attack by the mountain pine beetle, <i>Dendroctonus ponderosae</i> Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)
Keywords:
Dendroctonus ponderosae, semiochemicals, pheromones, verbenone, 2-phenyl ethanol, 3-methyl-2-cyclohexen-1-one, attack disruptionAbstract
When released from attractant-baited multiple-funnel traps, 3-methyl-2-cyclohexen-1- one (MCH) reduced catches of male and female mountain pine beetles, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, by 67.4% and 71.8%, respectively. 2-Phenyl ethanol reduced the respective catches by 96.6% and 95.1%, but only verbenone and all three compounds together reduced catches to levels no different from those in unbaited control traps. In another experiment, all three binary combinations of the above compounds, plus the ternary combination, reduced catches of both sexes by >96%. In comparable tree protection experiments near Princeton BC, MCH and 2-phenyl ethanol alone and together significantly reduced the percentages of pheromone-baited lodgepole pines that were attacked by 16.0%, 33.3% and 40.0%, respectively, but verbenone alone totally protected baited trees, and many trees within 5 m of them, from attack. In identical experiments near Prince George BC, where mountain pine beetle populations were much higher, adding MCH, 2-phenyl ethanol or both together to verbenone did not cause attack to be reduced significantly beyond that achieved by verbenone alone. Our results confirm that 2-phenyl ethanol is an antiaggregation pheromone for the mountain pine beetle, and that MCH is an interspecific synomone. However, because neither was as effective as verbenone in protecting pheromone-baited trees from attack, and adding either or both to verbenone did not improve protection, neither compound warrants further consideration as a potential tool for operational disruption of attack.References
Amman, G.D., R. W. Their, M.D. McGregor and R.F. Schmitz. 1989. Efficacy of verbenone in reducing lodgepole pine infestation by mountain pine beetles in Idaho. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19:60-64.
Bentz, B., C.K. Lister, J.M. Schmid, S.A. Mata, L.A. Rasmussen and D. Haneman. 1989. Does verbenone reduce mountain pine beetle attacks in susceptible stands of ponderosa pine? United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Research Note RM-495.
Borden, J.H., L.J. Chong, B.S. Lindgren, E.J. Begin, T.M. Ebata, L.E. Maclauchlan and R.S. Hodgkinson. 1993. A simplified tree bait for the mountain pine beetle. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 23:1108-1113.
Borden, J.H., L.J. Chong, T.J. Earle and D.P.W. Huber. 2003. Protection of lodgepole pine from attack by the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) using high doses of verbenone in combination with nonhost bark volatiles. The Forestry Chronicle 79: 685-691.
Day, R.W. and G.P. Quinn. 1989. Comparison of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology. Ecological Monographs 59: 433-463.
Gibson, K.E., R.F. Schmitz, G.D. Amman and R.D. Oakes. 1991. Mountain pine beetle response to= different verbenone dosages in pine stands of western Montana. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Research Paper INT-444.
Huber, D.P.W. and J.H. Borden. 2001. Protection of lodgepole pine from attack by mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae, with nonhost angiosperm volatiles and verbenone. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 92: 131-141.
Jones, D. 1984. Use, misuse, and role of multiple-comparison procedures in ecological and agricultural entomology. Environmental Entomology 13: 635-649.
Kostyk, B.C., J.H. Borden and G. Gries. 1993. Photoisomerization of antiaggregation pheromone verbenone: Biological and practical implications with respect to the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 19: 1749-1759.
Lindgren, B.S., J.H. Borden, G.H. Cushon, L.J. Chong and C.J. Higgins. 1989a. Reduction of mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) attack by verbenone in lodgepole pine stands in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19: 65-68.
Lindgren, B.S., M.D. McGregor, R.D. Oakes and H.E. Meyer. 1989b. Suppression of spruce beetle attacks by MCH released from bubble caps. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 4: 49-52.
Lister, C.K., J.M. Schmid, S.A. Mata, D. Haneman, C. O’Neil, J. Pasek and L. Sower. 1990. Verbenone bubble caps ineffective as a preventative strategy against mountain pine beetle attacks in ponderosa pine. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Research Note RM-501.
Pureswaran, D.S. and J.H. Borden. 2004. New repellent semiochemicals for three species of Dendroctonus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Chemoecology 14: 67-75.
Pureswaran, D.S., R. Gries, J.H. Borden and H.D. Pierce, Jr. 2000. Dynamics of pheromone production and communication in the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, and the pine engraver, Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Chemoecology 10: 153-168.
Rudinsky, J.A., M.M. Furniss, L.N. Kline, and R.F. Schmitz. 1972. Attraction and repression of Dendroctonus pseudotsugae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) by three synthetic pheromones in traps in Oregon and Idaho. The Canadian Entomologist 104: 815-822.
Shea, P.J., M.D. McGregor and G.E. Daterman. 1992. Aerial application of verbenone reduces attack by the mountain pine beetle. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22: 436-441.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia agree to the following terms:
-Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
-Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
-Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).