Testing an attracticide hollow fibre formulation for control of Codling Moth, <i>Cydia pomonella</i> (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Keywords:
sex pheromone, codling moth, attracticide, appleAbstract
Laboratory and field tests were conducted to evaluate the use of an experimental sprayable formulation of chopped hollow fibres loaded with codlemone and mixed with 1.0% esfenvalerate and an adhesive to control codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Moths were not repelled by the addition of the insecticide to the adhesive and were rapidly killed following brief contact. A significantly greater proportion of male moths flew upwind and contacted individual fibres for a longer period of time when fibres had been aged > 7 d versus fibres 0 – 7 days-old in flight tunnel tests. Field tests using sentinel fibres placed in 10.0 mg drops of adhesive on plastic disks stapled to the tree found that fibres were not touched until they had aged > 8 d. Conversely, moth mortality following a 3-s exposure to field-collected fibres deposited on the top of leaves was low in bioassays with fibres aged > 8 d. The deposition and adhesion of fibres within the apple canopy appear to be two major factors influencing the success of this approach. Fibres were found adhering to foliage, fruit, and bark within the orchard; however, visual recovery of fibres following each of the three applications was < 5.0%. Both the substrate and the positioning of the fibre on the substrate influenced fibre retention. The highest proportion of fibres was found initially on the upper surface of leaves and this position also had the highest level of fibre retention. Fibres on the underside of leaves or partially hanging off of a substrate were dislodged within two weeks.References
Analytical Software. 2000. Statistix 7, Tallahassee, FL.
Ashare, E., T.W. Brooks and D.W. Swenson. 1982. Controlled release from hollow fibres, pp. 238-258. In F. Kydonieus and M. Beroza (eds.), Insect suppression with controlled release pheromone systems, Volume 2. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Baker, T.C., R.T. Staten, and H.M. Flint. 1990. Use of pink bollworm pheromone in the southwestern United States, pp. 412-436. In R.L. Ridgway, R.M. Silverstein, and M.N. Inscoe (eds.), Behaviourmodifying chemicals for insect management. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, New York.
Beasley, C.A. and T.J. Henneberry. 1984. Combining gossyplure and insecticides in pink bollworm control. California Agriculture 38: 22-24.
Butler, G.D. and A.S. Las. 1983. Predaceous insects: effect of adding permethrin to the sticker used in gossyplure applications. Journal of Economic Entomology 76: 1448-1451.
Cardé, R.T., T.C. Baker, and P.J. Castrovillo. 1977. Disruption of sexual communication in Laspeyresia pomonella (codling moth), Grapholitha molesta (oriental fruit moth) and G. prunivora (lesser appleworm) with hollow fibre attractant sources. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 22: 280- 288.
Charmillot, P.J. and D. Pasquier. 1992. Lutte par confusion contre le carpocapse Cydia pomonella L. Revue Suisse de viticulture arboriculture horticulture 24: 213-220.
Charmillot, P.J., D. Hofer, and D. Pasquier. 2000. Attract and kill: a new method for control of the codling moth Cydia pomonella. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 94: 211-216.
Charmillot, P.J. and D. Pasquier. 2001. Essai préliminaire de lutte par confusion contre la cochylis Eupoecillia ambiguella et le carpocapse Cydia pomonella au moyen des microcapsules 3M. IOBC wprs Bulletin 24: 63-64.
Floyd, J.P. and C.A. Crowder. 1981. Sublethal effects of Permethrin on pheromone response and mating of male pink bollworm moths. Journal of Economic Entomology 74: 634-637.
Haynes, K.F., W.G. Li, and T.C. Baker. 1986. Control of pink bollworm moth (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) with insecticides and pheromones (Attracticide): lethal and sublethal effects. Journal of Economic Entomology 79: 1466-1471.
Lösel, P.M., G. Penners, R.P.J. Potting, D. Ebbinghaus, A. Elbert, and J. Scherkenbeck. 2000. Laboratory and field experiments towards the development of an attract and kill strategy for the control of the codling moth, Cydia pomonella. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 95: 39-46.
Moffitt, H.R. and R.E. Short. 1982. A ground mechanism for dispensing insect pheromones to fruit trees. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Report AAT-W-22.
Moffitt, H.R. and P.H. Westigard. 1984. Suppression of the codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) population on pears in southern Oregon through mating disruption with sex pheromone. Journal of Economic Entomology 77: 1513-1519.
Shorey, H.H. and R.G. Gerber. 1996. Use of puffers for disruption of sex pheromone communication of codling moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in walnut orchards. Environmental Entomology 25: 1398- 1400.
Toba, H.H. and J.F. Howell. 1991. An improved system for mass-rearing codling moths. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 88: 22-27.
Weatherston, I., D. Miller, and J. Lavoic-Dornik. 1985. Capillaries as controlled release devices for insect pheromones and other volatile substances – a reevaluation: part II. Predicting release rates from Celcon and Teflon capillaries. Journal of Chemical Ecology 11: 967-978.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia agree to the following terms:
-Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
-Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
-Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).